Q I am buying a digital SLR camera. Is optical stabilization or sensor-shift stabilization better?
MARK COYNE, ATLANTIC CITY, N.J.
A Both work extremely well. Optical stabilization is slightly more effective, but to have a 100 percent stabilized system, every lens must incorporate stabilization. This increases weight, complexity and cost, as well as the available selection of lenses. Canon, Nikon and Panasonic are the biggest proponents of optical stabilization.
Sensor-shift stabilization is built into the camera, so every lens you mount is stabilized. Almost all Olympus, Pentax and Sony SLRs incorporate sensor-shift stabilization.
I favor sensor-shift stabilization. I know that optical is slightly more effective, but I am willing to give up a bit of effectiveness for the luxury of having every single lens I mount on the camera stabilized, especially my close-up lenses. If I were shooting sports or wildlife with extreme telephoto lenses, I would opt for optical stabilization.
Looking for better sound Q I want to get better sound out of my iPod's earphones, but I am a college student and don't have a big budget. Can I get something worthwhile for $50 or less?
AMBER N., OAKLAND, CALIF.
A NuForce (www.nuforce-icon.com), known in audio circles for its high-end yet affordable electronics, has introduced earphones that have been getting raves everywhere. The $49 model includes a microphone so you can use them as a phone headset with an iPhone. They aren't compatible with all iPods, so be careful.