PINEHURST, N.C. – Tiger Woods hasn't won a major title since 2008. By the end of this week's U.S. Open, he will have gone 24 majors without a victory.
If recent history is prelude, Woods' absence at Pinehurst No. 2 this week will cause a dip in television ratings, proof that casual golf fans have concluded that Woods is the most interesting golfer in the world even when he's not playing well, or often, or at all.
They are entitled to be wrong, in much the same way that channel- flippers are entitled to waste their time watching the self-promoting, play-acting rednecks on "Duck Dynasty."
Phil Mickelson is more interesting than Woods in every category of life other than accumulated major titles.
Woods became a dominant golfer, portrayed himself as relentlessly boring, then succumbed to injuries and scandal. His achievements were interesting. His background was interesting. He himself turned out to be a drone pointed in the wrong direction.
If Woods' life is the back page of a tabloid, Mickelson's is the novel you can't put down.
Nothing Mickelson does is predictable.
Name another golfer who, after the first round of a prominent golf tournament, had FBI agents waiting to question him about alleged insider trading. That happened to Phil a few weeks ago at the Memorial. He's not only trying to beat Charles Howell III, he's trying to become Thurston Howell III.