After winning a combined nine games in 2010 and 2011 with an old team, the Vikings again have built an impressive roster.
I like where they are. I hate how they got here.
Perhaps only in the NFL can one praise the results of a team's decisions while questioning the rationale behind them.
This winter, the Vikings traded Percy Harvin, a remarkable talent, and cut Antoine Winfield, one of the great professionals of his generation. Saturday, they drafted a punter to challenge Chris Kluwe, who last year averaged a career-best net yards per punt.
In any other sport, those are the kinds of decisions that hamper franchises. In the NFL, the Vikings have built-in rationales often repeated around the league.
Trading away a franchise player in his prime like Harvin? That's hard to defend, unless you believe, as the Vikings have strongly hinted, that Harvin had become impossible to work with. The Vikings used the first-round pick they received from Seattle in the deal to take Florida State cornerback Xavier Rhodes, and they signed former Packer Greg Jennings to become their top receiver. If Jennings helps Christian Ponder become a better downfield passer and Rhodes becomes a starter, the Vikings will have fared reasonably well despite the obvious risk of trading Harvin.
Cutting Winfield from a team that is always looking for cornerback quality and depth? That's unwise, unless you believe Bill Belichick's philosophy of ditching veterans before they fall apart, not after. Winfield played very well in a lesser role last season, but he will be 36 next season. He's the kind of player I'd take a chance on, but the Vikings aren't the only well-run NFL team that fears paying older players.
Drafting a punter who presumably will take Kluwe's job? The Vikings spent a fifth-round draft pick to replace a player who does his job very well. Last year, Kluwe averaged 45 yards per punt (his third-best average during his nine NFL seasons) and a career-best 39.7 net yards per punt.