WASHINGTON – After one of the most litigious rounds of redistricting in recent history, movements have popped up in at least five states to take the power to draw legislative and congressional maps away from legislators and put it in the hands of commissioners.
The task of redistricting, done every 10 years after the U.S. Census counts the population, falls on state legislators in most states. But over the past five years, maps drawn by legislators in 40 states have been challenged in court amid accusations of gerrymandering or attempts to dilute minorities' voting power. The idea of a commission doing the mapping is attracting new interest:
• Legislators in Florida and Wisconsin are considering bills that would establish commissions to draw the lines.
•Republican Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland has created a task force to study how it can curb gerrymandering.
• Indiana, Nebraska and North Carolina considered bills this year that did not pass.
Twenty-three states have some sort of commission involved in redistricting. But they are a relatively recent development in the history of redistricting and their makeup varies widely, which leads some political scholars to say it's unclear whether commissions do a better job.
"There is a growing consensus that commissions are not any worse and are perhaps better," said Michael Li, redistricting counsel at New York University's Brennan Center for Justice. "Where you have commissions there seems to be a lot less contentious and protracted litigation."
But Bruce Cain, a political-science professor at Stanford University, said his research suggests that commission plans tend to fare equally in court when it comes to whether the maps they draw are rejected or upheld.