Five years ago, the mid-market Milwaukee Bucks had a young Giannis Antetokounmpo and Khris Middleton to go with several spare roster parts. They won just 33 games and missed the playoffs — part of a trend that had seen the Bucks either miss the playoffs or lose in the first round in every season since 2001.
Two years ago, the Phoenix Suns won just 19 games. That was after seasons of 23, 24 and 21 wins. The franchise looked hopeless, even if Devin Booker was emerging as a scoring threat. There were realistic aspirations of a franchise swooping in and trading for Booker — maybe even the Timberwolves, where his buddy Karl-Anthony Towns plays.
But fast-forward to this season, and, well, the story is obviously completely changed for both franchises. The Suns are on an accelerated timeline compared to the Bucks, who had to grind through some playoff disappointment to get here. but both have arrived at the NBA Finals as unexpected but not out-of-place competitors.
When Game 1 tips off Tuesday, one thing local NBA fans might want to ask themselves — and something Patrick Reusse and I mused about on Tuesday's Daily Delivery podcast — is how much the trajectories of these two franchises should give the Wolves hope about the path they might be on.
If you don't see the podcast player, tap here to listen.
Here's what I would say: Each individual team is different, so it's hard to draw direct 1 to 1 comparisons without overstepping some boundaries.
But I do think there is a little "why not us?" feeling that a Wolves fan could get from seeing these two teams meet in the finals.
The Suns were awful for four straight years and didn't even make the postseason last year despite improving. They had a mix of good role players, the internal development of Booker and the key veteran signing of Chris Paul. Combine that with a Western Conference that was suddenly wide open and everything fell into place.