'Victim B' looked down at her statement, nervously folding and unfolding it. Four pages, single spaced, that she spent months forming in her head, two weeks writing, and was determined to read, even though she didn't have to.
Her rapist's crime was so heinous that state law required the judge in the case to sentence him to life. This late July hearing was but a formality.
Assistant Hennepin County Attorney Chris Freeman walked up to reassure her.
"There won't be any surprises," he said.
"OK," she replied, nodding her head. She didn't fear that he would go free, but instead what would happen if she didn't go through with this. For her own sake, she needed to see it through.
As part of sweeping changes in victims' rights across the country, the Minnesota Legislature in 1988 allowed the option for those harmed by crime to make a statement at the perpetrator's sentencing. Since then, there has been a national debate as to whether it actually helps victims. The evidence is generally mixed. A 2015 study in the European Journal of Criminology found that delivering a victim impact statement "does not give rise to direct 'therapeutic' effects," but victims who experience more control over their recovery found a decrease in anger and anxiety.
The risk in giving a statement is that it could re-traumatize a survivor and disrupt the healing process, said Laura Palumbo, the communications director for the National Sexual Violence Resource Center. But taking such a risk can also be valuable.
"Because it is such a vulnerable act, it is all the more powerful and healing when there is a positive outcome," she said.