By Kevin Diaz kevin.diaz@startribune.com
The Republican slam on Minnesota Democrat Collin Peterson is that he supports the so-called sequester, "but won't cut funding for robotic squirrels."
The Democratic attack on Minnesota Republican Erik Paulsen is that he "turns a blind eye to thousands of jobs in jeopardy."
It remains to be seen how onerous the automatic sequester budget cuts will be for ordinary Americans. But amid a growing recognition that the cuts are here to stay, they've turned into a powerful fundraising and political tool for lawmakers in Washington and their political parties.
With an eye toward midterm elections next year that could determine President Obama's second-term legacy, the Democratic and Republican campaign arms in Congress are in full attack mode, with sequester cuts as the weapon of choice.
In Minnesota, much of the Republican fire has been directed at Peterson, a moderate DFLer in a Republican-tilting district that the GOP hopes could help it retain control of the U.S. House.
The Democrats, meanwhile, have aimed primarily at Paulsen, a potential challenger to U.S. Sen. Al Franken.
The crossfire comes amid deepening partisan rifts that show no sign of producing a deal to avert the $1.2 trillion in across-the-board spending cuts that both parties say they oppose.