The little boy, maybe 3, was running up the hill of a city park. It was a pristine day and I thought at first that he was playing a game of hide-and-seek with the young man and woman I assumed were his parents.
But the couple, barely in their 20s, kept running away. I heard them laugh as they ducked behind trees. The little boy rushed toward the vast emptiness, frantic, crying, desperate to find them. This wasn't a game. This was torment.
Over the years, and it's been so many years, I've thought about that little boy. He returned to me recently as I reviewed a groundbreaking study published by the American Psychological Association.
The title: "Unseen Wounds."
We are in the middle of a crucial dialogue about what it means to truly protect our children from harm. The Adrian Peterson story is pushing us to define what is and is not physical abuse. The heartbreak of 4-year-old Eric Dean of Starbuck, Minn., killed by his stepmother despite more than 15 abuse reports, demands policy change around reporting of physical violence.
On another front, long-awaited resolutions in the clergy sex abuse scandal are moving us away, at last, from institutionalized denial, and may encourage more victims of childhood sex abuse to come forward.
"Unseen Wounds" challenges us to spread our critical arms wider still.
The study, soon to be published, revealed that psychological abuse — difficult to define and rarely addressed in prevention programs — is often more harmful to children than sexual or physical abuse.