Despite all evidence to the contrary, polls have consistently shown that some Republicans don't believe President Barack Obama was born in this country. Apparently, mere proof does not sway their opinion.
It does not matter to them that the White House broke down last year and produced Obama's birth certificate to put a stop to the nonsense. The nonsense continues or has taken other absurd forms.
The most fanatical birther holdouts are today's equivalent of the Japanese soldiers on Pacific islands in 1945 who did not believe World War II had ended and refused to surrender. Similarly, the remnant imperial army of birthers still lurks in the jungle thickets of American misinformation, receiving instructions via talk radio.
Last month, Mitt Romney, the Republican candidate for president, revived the giddy romance of the birthers' obsession by making a little joke while visiting his home state of Michigan with his wife Ann: "No one's ever asked to see my birth certificate. They know that this is the place that we were born and raised."
That is true. However, it raises another thought: The American people know Romney's birthplace but not where some of his money was born and raised. As birth certificates are not officially issued for money, the only way to find out might be to see his tax returns for the past dozen years.
The Republican candidate already has conceded that tax returns are useful public information by issuing one full return for 2010 and an estimate for 2011. By contrast, Obama has released a dozen years of returns.
What does Mitt Romney have to hide? That he is rich? The American people probably could stand the shock. This secretive behavior only raises suspicions, especially as Romney lived in France as a younger man. France! Where same-sex couples and others indulge in existentialism without shame!
What would the American people think if it turns out that Romney was a crumb who had invested heavily in the croissant and baguette industry here or abroad?