Ten years ago, "ride sharing" was something parents did driving kids to soccer practice. How times have changed. Today, Uber and Lyft are household names for pairing you with strangers who will safely drive wherever you want to go.
But this ongoing transportation revolution is not just the work of Silicon Valley visionaries. An Ecuadorean immigrant in Minneapolis, Luis Paucar, heralded the beginning of this trend.
Ten years ago, Paucar ran a small Twin Cities-area taxicab company serving Richfield and a few other suburbs. He wanted to serve customers in Minneapolis as well. But he couldn't: At the time, the city capped the number of taxi licenses at 343 vehicles. To go into business, he would have had to purchase a license from an existing owner, at a cost of more than $20,000.
All Paucar wanted to do was give people safe, affordable transportation and employ drivers in the process.
But that was illegal without "buying out" one of his competitors.
Instead of playing along within this monopolistic system, Paucar changed it. In October 2006, he and a coalition successfully convinced the City Council to lift the cap. Over the next five years, more taxi licenses were issued, and then the cap was lifted completely. Anyone with insurance, a safe vehicle, and a clean record could own a taxicab and serve the public.
The result? It has become a lot easier to catch a cab. Now there are 980 Minneapolis taxi licenses, an increase of 185 percent. Back in 2005, there were 10 taxi companies. Today there are 42. Moreover, in 2005, none of the taxi companies offered Spanish-language dispatch. Now several — including Paucar's — can take calls from Spanish-speaking customers.
Despite these changes, the established taxi owners weren't going to take losing their monopoly lying down. In 2007, they sued the city, arguing that by offering more competition, the city committed a constitutional "taking," because it didn't pay off Paucar's formerly protected competitors. Ending the monopoly without compensation, they astoundingly argued, was unconstitutional.