The arithmetic of Richfield's budget dilemma is simple.
The city's $19 million budget took a $619,000 hit in December with local government aid cuts by the state. Now, Richfield faces proposed state cuts of $2.7 million more over the next two years.
Instead of waiting for final numbers, city officials have started cutting. Dozens of Minnesota cities are making similar pre-emptive moves. Unwilling to wait for Gov. Tim Pawlenty and legislators to work out their budget differences, they are making tough choices now.
In tiny, proud Richfield, residents who live on streets that are brightly lighted and where trees with Dutch elm disease are speedily removed may soon see a streetlight fee added to their utility bills. Their city forester is gone, and the battle to save the remaining elms may be over.
Cities making cuts range from urban centers -- St. Paul is discussing possible layoffs -- to small suburbs such as Columbia Heights, where jobs have been cut and employees are taking two-week unpaid furloughs.
According to the League of Minnesota Cities, Burnsville, Eagan, Lakeville, Rochester, Duluth and Brainerd are among the cities that already are cutting budgets and sometimes jobs. While some cities are slicing costs that are invisible to the public -- delaying purchase of a dump truck, postponing a computer upgrade -- others will be noticeable.
Cambridge won't fix as many cracks in roads or paint as many crosswalks. Vadnais Heights and Caledonia won't seal coat streets. Austin and Le Sueur will cut back on flower gardens and baskets. In Eagan, athletic fields won't have concession stands.
It's worse than in 2003