Researchers were worried that a strange new affliction was harming about half of Minnesota's black bears. They found evidence that bears were having cubs later in life, and fewer of them.
Oddly, only the bears with the most food available to them – near the farms and young oak forests of central and northwestern Minnesota – appeared to be stunted in their reproduction. Was a pesticide or change in the food web threatening the next generation of one of the state's most beloved and recognizable wild animals?
Now state biologists believe the opposite may be happening: That some of Minnesota's bears have become so fat that the old ways of testing for their general health and reproductive age may no longer work.
"It could be that rather than things getting worse, they could be getting better and these bears are growing much quicker than ever before," said Andrew Tri, bear biologist for the state Department of Natural Resources (DNR).
It depends on what, exactly, is happening to their teeth.
Over the past 40 years, researchers have learned a great deal about individual bears and populations by the rings of their teeth. Every time a hunter shoots a bear in Minnesota, they must mail one of its teeth to the DNR, offering the state a rare trove of data and history. The teeth are sliced, dyed and examined under a microscope to measure rings, like those on an oak tree.
Wider rings in the teeth are evidence of good, healthy years with ample food. Narrow ones show lean times and stress. In females, those narrow rings, in part of the tooth called cementum, can be used to find exactly how old they were when they had their first cubs, and the same for each litter they produced thereafter.
"When they're nursing cubs all that milk is coming out of body resources, mostly out of fat," Tri said. "So you can imagine there are less resources that are going into cementum growth and things like that."