Just when I thought I'd heard everything about the Spitzer-Paterson-McGreevey triad of bad behavior, a friend called with an angle I never considered. "Nine months," she said. "Nine months to a mini baby boom."
Seems her husband of many years arrived home from a business trip with the Spitzer gossip still raw and unraveling. They took a walk, started talking about politicians and prostitutes, segued into their own fantasies and where they'd draw the line and, apparently, couldn't get home fast enough. (The kids were away.)
I say good for them -- not because of the sex, but because of the bravery.
It's easy to imagine how that playful banter could have veered off track into a multicar pileup. What if her fantasy involved his boss or best friend? What if he blurted out, say, that time on a business trip ... ohhh, noooo. What if their lines were drawn at vastly different lengths?
Most couples in a relationship that's lasted 10 minutes past the honeymoon stage know that money (how it's made and spent) is an ugly sore erupting periodically into heated debate. Sexual desires, on the other hand? Not gonna talk about that.
It's a pity, really. I've read enough books, interviewed enough therapists and written enough about sex to know that most people have unfulfilled desires and strong opinions, which they share with everyone but the person they're having sex with. Or not having sex with.
Where does this strategy lead us? To a growing trend in homes with two master bedrooms.
We can do better. The question is, how? How do we ask our partners dicey questions about desire and disappointment, primal attraction and propriety, without spinning out of control? Without losing more ground than we have already?