The wait for an elevator in Abdi Mohamoud's building on Minneapolis' West Bank can stretch to 15 minutes, so he often walks up eight flights to his apartment, through a stairwell with rusty pipes.
Once, a pipe burst near the elevators, spewing dirty water and forcing a family to evacuate. The building's washers and dryers sometimes eat Mohamoud's quarters or leave his clothes dirtier than when he put them in.
Tenants at the state's largest affordable housing complex recite these and other defects at Riverside Plaza, which the current landlord says was built too cheaply and has critical systems and parts failing.
That's why the Minneapolis City Council last week took the first step toward helping to finance a $113.7 million purchase-rehab of the multi-building complex that hovers over two freeways. The council's preliminary earmarking of $80 million in tax-exempt bonds -- to be bought by institutional investors and repaid from rents -- was encouraged by dozens of predominantly East African-immigrant residents bused to City Hall.
They represented an estimated 4,440 people who populate the 1,303 units at the site once known as Cedar Square West -- a population greater that some of the state's smaller counties. Federal vouchers subsidize the rents for 62 percent of the units, compared to a mere 20 percent when the complex opened in 1974.
Without thorough replacement of pipes and building systems, "we're basically asking for a disaster," Matt Goldstein, the city's coordinator for the project, told council members. Some warn that a building failure could flood the low-income housing market with tenants seeking shelter.
Yet the price tag has raised some eyebrows, especially among longtime critics of developer George Sherman, managing partner of the group that bought the complex in 1988 after the federal government foreclosed on the original developer.
What may also surprise some is Sherman's pursuit of $21.6 million in federal and state historic tax credits for a complex only 36 years old. "To award such status to that property is to insult and abuse historic preservation," David Markle, a Sherman critic, wrote to federal officials recently.