MORRIS, MINN. - As last month's strike by campus AFSCME workers progressed, the University of Minnesota faced increased criticism from DFL legislators.
The strike, in the words of Rep. Alice Hausman, DFL-St. Paul, "left a sour taste in our mouth."
On Friday, the regents met for the first time since about 1,000 clerical, technical and health care workers returned to work. Meeting at the University of Minnesota-Morris, the regents approved the university's largest-ever capital request, which will be considered by the same legislators who were critical during the strike.
The university is asking the state for $238 million to help pay for projects totaling just more than $308 million. The request would pay for new buildings on the Twin Cities and Duluth campuses and for about $100 million in repairs across the state.
University President Robert Bruininks said the plan addresses weaknesses in infrastructure and described it as being "without excess" and called it "urgent."
But in the wake of only the second strike in 60 years at the university, how will the request from the state's flagship university be received by the DFL-controlled Legislature?
"I think the strike was regrettable, and obviously no one wins, but I think at the end of the day, we have to consider the long-range importance of the University of Minnesota," Bruininks said. "If we don't keep investing in the University of Minnesota, we won't have the ability to compete to develop the resources to keep the jobs vibrant for our employees and for our state's economy."
As the AFSCME strike progressed, it became clear that some legislators were not pleased with the university. House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher, DFL-Minneapolis, criticized Bruininks in a letter. Sens. John Marty, DFL-Roseville, and Patricia Torres-Ray, DFL-Minneapolis, and Rep. Frank Hornstein, DFL-Minneapolis, held a news conference in support of striking workers.