I would like to offer a defense of the skyways as well as an alternative solution to Eric Dayton's foot traffic concerns.
What makes a destination attractive to prospective visitors, referring to everyone from Twin Citizens contemplating where to spend their Saturdays to domestic and international tourists, isn't bustling streets. Bustling streets are the reward for an attractive destination.
A primary component of an attractive destination is uniqueness — something people can't see, do, experience or bungee jump off of anywhere else.
The skyways are one of the Twin Cities' precious few unique components. Love 'em or hate 'em, they stick in visitors' minds — visitors who then go home and tell the tale of their fanciful journey through the skyways to friends, rewarding Minneapolis with the unparalleled, profile-raising power of word-of-mouth marketing.
Busy streets with glimmering shops don't have the same effect, nor do music festivals, burgeoning brew pub scenes or sportball venues that occasionally attract a marquee event.
If we don't innovate, evolve and take risks, we're never going to reach beyond middling status as a tourist destination and an appealing place to live. In the spirit of risk-taking, I would like to offer an alternative proposal for revitalizing downtown Minneapolis' streets:
Pedestrianize them.
I'm no city planner, but just as an example, we could block off the section from Hennepin Avenue to Third Avenue South and from 10th Street to Fourth Street. If we wanted to get crazy, we could also pedestrianize short arms that bump out and connect the Convention Center, U.S. Bank Stadium and Target Field to the core area.