•••
This is just ridiculous. As U.S. debt hits $34.7 trillion, an amount which precipitates interest payments larger than the military budget, we hear from our elected representatives: ... (pause for effect) ... crickets. I don’t get it. It shouldn’t matter if you are Democrat, Republican or any other flavor of partisan. This is vital stuff and a plan needs to be made. All of us know that only garbage will arise from continuing a pattern of irresponsible fiscal management; spending without consequence is a “let’s pretend” approach.
A June 18 article highlights that the debt could swell to $50.7 trillion within the next decade. Our representatives in the House and Senate are responsible for our fiscal well-being, and it’s time they act like it. Of course they will have to discuss, negotiate and compromise. That’s what real leaders do. But if they don’t, and allow this to pile up alongside all the other problems they “pretend” with, the U.S. will actually become the real mess each political party says the other is creating. That’s not what any of us want. (Right? Republicans and Democrats?)
Let’s all keep that in mind through this election cycle. If your candidate isn’t concerned about this, be very concerned about their commitment and qualification. You need someone who is. Someone who is willing to not blame it away and instead wants to work with others to improve this. I for one do not want to leave this debt for my children and grandchildren to wade in.
Alan Briesemeister, Delano
SOCIAL SECURITY
Keep the tax, but spend it better
Minnesota is only one of a small number of states that tax Social Security. But there is something missing in this discussion (Readers Write, June 19). Who will really benefit from eliminating this tax? I volunteered to prepare taxes for AARP for six years, and the majority of clients were low-income, and the majority of them paid no tax on Social Security anyway. A recent report from the Minnesota House Research Department titled “Minnesota Taxation of Social Security Income” from March 2024 states that “In tax year 2024, taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes below $105,380 (married joint returns) or $82,190 (single/head of household) do not pay state income tax on Social Security.” Eliminating tax on Social Security does nothing for low-income taxpayers; it only helps the wealthier. If Minnesota wants to do something to help low-income taxpayers, the state should keep this tax and put the proceeds into a program that helps low-income residents. Minnesota should be a leader in this effort, not a lemming.
Michael Herman, Chisago City, Minn.