JUSTICE HAS BEEN SERVED! ("Derek Chauvin guilty on all counts in the death of George Floyd," StarTribune.com, April 20.) Thank you, God in heaven!
Sharon E. Carlson, Andover
• • •
Thank you to the jury, judge and court system for securing justice in the case against Derek Chauvin. Thank you to the courageous witnesses. Thank you to anyone involved in inventing cellphones with cameras, the accountability tool we wish we'd had for Emmett Till and all the many others. Let's be grateful today, and tomorrow let's get to work to ensure voting rights, end educational disparities and more. The list is long, and we can bend the arc of history toward justice. Onward.
Kathleen Janasz, Edina
JUDGE CAHILL
Calm, professional and in control
As the trial of Derek Chauvin comes to an end, we should acknowledge and thank Judge Peter Cahill for the masterful job he did presiding over the trial. It was a difficult, emotional case with many witnesses and competing arguments. Judge Cahill's calm demeanor and the control he exercised over the trial ensured an orderly proceeding where both sides were able to fairly and fully present their case to the jury. He ruled on motions quickly and provided the reasoning for those decisions. His tone was always measured and courteous. Minnesota was well served by his expertise and the way he judges. We owe him our thanks.
I should also mention that behind the scenes were many hardworking staff in the court administration offices. The work and planning they did to set up the logistics for a safe and secure trial in the COVID era, care for the jurors and provide a state-of-the-art, technologically enhanced trial was no accident. Their support was so unobtrusive that you would have hardly noticed them, which is a credit to their professionalism and competence.
During this case the judicial and court administration teams worked hard to ensure justice, and they succeeded. Thank you.
Mike Moriarity, Eden Prairie
• • •
Derek Chauvin's attorney sought a mistrial on Monday because of comments made by U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters over the weekend. While Judge Cahill did not accept this as grounds for a mistrial, he said her remarks were inappropriate and could lead to an appeal. In voicing that concern, he essentially rose to the same level of hyperbole as Waters.
If outside influence were such a concern, the huge display of force across the city of Minneapolis would have been reason enough for sequestration. That alone implied the actions of the people whom Cahill serves cannot be trusted, and it would have been impossible for the jury not to have picked up on this. In comparison, Waters' words seem more like an expectation than an afterthought.
And what about the incendiary comments made the other day by Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida? He essentially said the whole trial in Minnesota had been bungled from the start. Unlike Waters, his comments were totally lacking in ambiguity. How is it that comments like this didn't become part of Judge Cahill's self-righteous narrative?