It seems that a video put out by Vanity Fair has advised Hillary Clinton to take up knitting, among other suggestions, to help her get over her election loss to Donald Trump. But why not encourage President Trump to start knitting as well? In fact, I have long maintained that Trump should learn to knit, but specifically using the "in-the-round" style (as opposed to regular "flat" knitting). That way, he would always be working on the right side! He has already mastered the going-around-in-circles part of it.
Sharon Aaseng, Hastings
WHY GOVERNMENT IS MISTRUSTED
Exhibit A: Instant pay raises. Exhibit B: Apologism for same.
Commenting on the Dec. 28 letter about the Minneapolis City Council pay hike ("Pay hike was realistic thing to do," commenting on "Council pay hike needlessly sneaky," editorial, Dec. 27). Oh, please. The whole position from the Star Tribune was not the pay hike but how it was done. The reader's comments give the old position of many politicians when they take the old woe-is-me attitude. This is why most people have a less-than-high opinion of politicians. The reader stated that transparency is not always fair or practical. What a bunch of hooey. What is so impractical in stating a resolution?
And they wonder why they are not trusted.
Barry Jorgenson, Stillwater
• • •
The Star Tribune Editorial Board seems upset that Minneapolis City Council members gave themselves "sneaky" pay raises. Well, at least some of them will keep working while being paid at the higher rate. Compare this with U.S. Sen. Al Franken's "sneaky" raise he gave himself, by resigning on Jan. 2 instead of Dec. 31. His raise will last for a lifetime, and he will not work a single day while "enjoying" it! (He will get paid an extra $3,000 a year in pension money by waiting to retire in 2018 instead of 2017).
Richard Trickel, Crosslake, Minn.
CHRISTMAS, CONTINUED
'War of words' at the U? Is that all? My donation depends on it.
The recent University of Minnesota controversy ("War of words, not 'war on Christmas,' at the U," Dec. 27) is being called "ill-advised" by school officials. I suspect the real reason they are red-faced is because a memo about holiday parties in the agricultural college got far too much public exposure. Yet I am sure that U officials agree that we should "value our diversity" and "all are welcome" slogans. Yet this mentality exists? Obviously, there is a special dislike for traditions of American culture and religion. But how will the graduates cope when they leave that enclave of "safe spaces"? I'll remember this when I receive the U's alumni donation letter.
Joe Polunc, Cologne
• • •
The recommendations cited in the Dec. 27 article are largely reasonable ones for a public university. The line between "winter-themed" and "Christmas-themed" may seem blurry in some cases, but I suggest the following gauge: If the decoration would seem out of place at the beginning of February, then it's probably related to a religious holiday and should not be promoted by a public institution. The end of a semester and beginning of a break are reason enough for a campus to celebrate.