So Texas has pretty much outlawed abortion ("Texas begins abortion vigilante era," front page, Sept. 3). Well, surely, they expanded access to birth control, opened more Planned Parenthoods to facilitate that and support sex education in the schools. No? Well, of course, then, they have mandated paid family leave, universal free preschool and subsidized child care costs? They haven't? Then they must support health insurance for all, not to mention paternity tests to find the other parent of these babies, who will be born and need support, both financial and emotional, for the rest of their lives? And obviously, based on their belief in the sanctity of life, specifically for children, they are pro-vaccine and advocates for mask mandates?
None of that? So these babies will now be born to low-income mothers (we know all the wives, girlfriends, daughters, mistresses of these legislators who voted for this can easily pay for a flight out of Texas to get their abortion), who will need support from the "system" whether it be food stamps, Medicaid, etc. They will be criticized and put down for being lazy, receiving government aid and having so many children.
If this fight was really about caring for babies and children, don't you think they might help them once they are out of the womb?
Megan Nuthals, Plymouth
•••
No question, an unwanted pregnancy is challenging or worse. And if no abortion takes place the mother normally gets to live. If someone is genuinely convinced through an individual sense of ethics and logic that an unborn child with a heartbeat is human, then there are two lives and bodies involved, not just one. I just ask that readers think about that.
Jim Bartos, Maple Grove
•••