It would seem that far too many people's tolerance for the disgusting behavior of President Donald Trump has more to do with the performance of the stock market than with any measure of decency ("Economy softens Trump disapproval," Star Tribune Minnesota Poll, Jan. 14). I write not as a victim but as an old man with sufficient retirement income, a little investment portfolio, and more white privilege than I or anyone should have. In other words, I'm not writing from a position of financial suffering, but truly, from a position of spiritual suffering. Are those 30 pieces of silver really worth compromising our dignity, our decency, our compassion and our responsibility for the greater good of all our citizens? I so hope not.
Jay Hornbacher, Hopkins
• • •
When 83 percent of Republicans in this state answer in the affirmative to the question "Do you think Donald Trump generally speaks the truth, or not?" — my brain hurts. What world are they living in? This man has built his entire presidency on lies and inconsistencies. That cannot be contested. The Washington Post clocks him at 5.6 lies per day (2,001 lies in total as president, as of Jan. 10). His brand is incoherence, wild exaggerations and straight-up BS.
Does it not say something that I and my liberal friends would gladly, happily, joyfully accept Mitt Romney, John McCain or George W. Bush — all previous standard-bearers of the Republican Party — as our president instead of this man? Doesn't that tell you, my fellow Americans, that this isn't a reaction against conservatism? It's a reaction against a disintegration of truth, of basic respect and of a sense of duty to country instead of naked self-interest.
We are witnessing in this presidency, with an exhaustion bordering on complicity, the complete erosion of a reality we can all agree on. Without that foundational starting point, how will we ever act in our collective interest instead of as factions operating inside of their own worlds? It's frightening. It's tribal. It's primitive. And we are capable of so much more than this.
Travis Anderson, Minneapolis
• • •
If the poll is accurate (45 percent approval of Trump), Minnesota is now a state considerably more pro-Trump than the rest of the nation. (Gallup had him recently at his highest in a while at 39 percent, and other national polls have him lower than that).
Do the pollsters think that Minnesota is 7 percent to 10 percent more pro-Trump than the nation? If so, that is important news. Isn't it more likely that the weighting is wrong? With national polls showing that voters by a considerable margin (10 percent to 18 percent) favor a generic Democrat over a generic Republican for Congress, was the sample too heavily weighted in favor of Republicans?