•••
I have lived in the Twin Cities for more than 20 years, and I continue to be amazed by a citizenry in which the majority have rarely seen a tax they don't like. Yep, here we are being told that those in Minneapolis should expect a 5.7% property tax increase solely to address a situation where too many property owners are not taking care of their own businesses, and apparently it is highly supported ("Should Minneapolis shovel its own sidewalks?" Jan. 6).
There are so many ways this could be handled rather than raise a tax on all citizens, and it starts by enforcing the law, but none were mentioned in the article. There is only the usual jump to raise tax and place the burden on all citizens, instead of resolving it with a focus only on the offenders. We (the government) could and should clear sidewalks when property owners do not do so, and charge the property owners for the full cost. There should also be a fine added to the full cost to show that the city is serious about enforcement.
But whatever the solution is, I only ask that the city does not immediately, once again, dump the burden on all taxpayers rather than simply address a few offenders. This is one tax that no one should like.
Matt Gulling, St. Paul
'MINDFUL DRINKING'
Just another diversion
The article "Raise a glass to mindful drinking" (Variety, Jan. 6) serves as another mechanism to enable many who should abstain from alcohol from doing so. A practicing alcoholic constantly searches for any method that will allow them to rationalize their continued destructive behavior. The concept of mindful drinking is just another alternative to seeking help for a very real problem.
Chuck Justice, Woodbury