In his Aug. 21 commentary "Let's save bats — without killing the timber industry," Wayne E. Brandt describes the important role the Northern Long-Eared Bat plays in forest ecology very well, but argues against listing them as endangered. Brandt dismisses the idea of protecting the breeding trees used by bats to raise their young because he fears the forest industry would be destroyed.
This sky-is-falling mentality is not useful. Brandt calls instead for finding a cure for white-nose disease. If this disease is anything like other diseases, it could take a very long time to find that cure. When, as in the present case, population numbers can quickly drop by 99 percent (Northeast United States) in a region, there is no other course but to consider the species at risk of extinction. An endangered listing is warranted.
Of course, we need to seek a cure for the disease, but actions must be taken to support the remaining stocks of bats while the search for a cure continues. Classifying the bat as endangered would release funds to seek a cure, but also support efforts to find effective ways to slow the spread of the disease.
JIM HAWKINS, Minneapolis
COMMUNITY ACTION
Board members ignored problems
As members (in name, at best) of the board of directors of Community Action of Minneapolis, professional politicians U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, state Sen. Jeff Hayden and Minneapolis City Council President Barbara Johnson acted with professional shock and surprise at the allegations of financial chicanery leveled at the CEO of this nonprofit.
Does their lack of professional oversight and insincere reaction not reveal their hypocrisy, their indifference to their board responsibility and their betrayal of the public trust? Is it not ironic that this organization focuses on helping the very people these politicians pretend to champion? Some champions.
Had these politicians any semblance of respect or honor, they would resign their political offices and spend time contemplating their hubris and betrayal. But we already see signs they consider themselves too big, too important to fail. If these politicians cannot be bothered to oversee the operation of a local nonprofit designed to help the poor, why should we trust them with oversight of an entire city or district? To put it another way, if they were financial advisers, would you invest money with them?
GEORGE K. ATKINS, Minneapolis
• • •
I don't hold any psychic powers, but I foresee all the politicians involved in the Community Action of Minneapolis catastrophe being re-elected with cheers and praises come their next election cycle.