The front page of the Sept. 15 Star Tribune caught my attention completely. The fact that minorities are missing out on an income surge did not take me by surprise in the least. I read with a high level of interest to find out "why" and "what" is being done.
Unfortunately, I didn't see a why or a decent account of what is being done. Sure, the state is spending $35 million to do and accomplish who knows what? What is the measure of success for spending this $35 million, Mr. Governor? How can $35 million of our money change this disparity? Nothing in the story told me that. The only reference — albeit an indirect reference — to the "why" was the great part about 22-year-old Jazmine Hawkins NOT waiting for another handout but taking her life into her own hands — getting an education that will allow her to actively move up the ladder.
Good for her. THAT was the story.
How on earth a story like this can be written without addressing the 900-pound elephant in the corner called education is beyond me. This was an education disparity long before it was an income disparity.
Steve ONeil, St. Louis Park
• • •
The article says that white household incomes increased but not minority household incomes. The accompanying graph shows that both white and Asian household incomes increased by 2 percent. The article also failed to mention that Asian household incomes are higher than those of whites. That seems to be worth mentioning. It is also worth noting that the article is comparing household incomes, not individual incomes. One reason for differences in household incomes is different numbers of adults in the household. About 50 percent of black households have only one adult, compared with 17 percent of white households and 8 percent of Asian households.
James Brandt, New Brighton
• • •
So, many minorities will miss out on the state's income surge. Since a lot of them are minimum-wage earners, Minneapolis can help them by raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour.