END-OF-LIFE CARE
It's not a tragedy to spend down savings
Frank Domurad ("In U.S. today, no margin for illness," Sept. 7) writes that his aunt's lifetime savings of $250,000 were consumed paying her nursing home costs. He wrote that his aunt "had worked all her life for nothing" because at death she had nothing left to leave as inheritances to various nieces and nephews.
I have to disagree with Mr. Domurad. His aunt, in my eyes, lived a noble life. She set aside savings during her working life so that, at the end, even if misfortune struck, she had the resources to pay her own way without becoming a burden to the government or to taxpayers. From their aunt's life, these nephews and nieces received something more valuable than a cash inheritance. They saw how a self-sufficient life should be lived.
PHILIP JACOBSON, MINNEAPOLIS
* * *
LAND USE
More to the story in Dakota County
A Sept. 6 article ("Dakota County land protected but not open to the public"), and especially its headline, were very misleading. Dakota County has used money from the Farmland and Natural Areas Program to help other entities like the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and cities acquire more than 1,500 acres of natural areas that are publicly accessible.
This program has provided a triple benefit for county taxpayers because it leverages noncounty funds to purchase the land and doesn't have ongoing maintenance costs and because the land meets the ecological and public use goals of the program.
This program was approved overwhelmingly by the voters in 2002 as a water quality, natural area and farmland protection program. It is not a park acquisition program, and no one ever said it would be.
These natural lands provide numerous public benefits (this was briefly referenced in the article) including habitat for fish and wildlife, ground and surface water protection, flood storage, carbon sequestration, scenic value, etc.