Auto magnate Henry Ford supposedly said, "History is bunk." Mayor Jacob Frey and his allies including the Star Tribune appear to agree. Attention to the history of police reform in Minneapolis would teach us that the problem is not a lack of good ideas for reform but holding police accountable to mandated reforms. Look at what happened to bodycams. The police simply turned them off. Civilian review boards? The police stonewalled and refused to cooperate until civilian oversight was reduced to meaningless theater. Multiple new kinds of training? Why not, as long as they get paid, it means a day off the beat and long lunch breaks. Again, history would tell us that the challenge is not ideas for reform but how to hold the police accountable for their behavior.
And why should they be accountable? Staffing and funding are guaranteed by the current charter. The police are privileged and protected in ways no other city employees are. A majority of us refused to change the charter. This makes our common challenge more difficult. So be it. Let's just not forget our history. We may disagree on which reforms are better or which should come first. These differences can be negotiated. The real challenge, whatever the reform, is holding police accountable for their behavior. Let's all get to solving this. Now.
Frederick W. Smith, Minneapolis
•••
Those who believe math is hard might be challenged to realize that a 44% "yes" vote on City Question 2 means almost half of voters supported the public safety amendment ("Police plan fails," front page, Nov. 3). If we had left the police question out of it and asked instead how many people were in favor of more mental health and social workers, violence interrupters, addiction counselors and homeless advocates on the ground, what would the "yes" vote have looked like? If we had asked about more social supports in food, housing, education, health care, youth programming and jobs to decrease the desperation that leads to crime, what would the "yes" vote have looked like? Many "no" voters were fearful of losing police — and at the same time would have supported the addition of all the other pieces envisioned in a Public Safety Department.
The task now is to come together to create the both/and approach to public safety and also to refocus on the original issue that was lost in the "defund the police" chant: How will we hold police accountable when their actions fail to recognize the dignity of human life?
Helen Henly, Minneapolis
•••