I read the Jan. 28 front-page article "Millions of followers, and all of them fake" because it raises questions about the veracity of everything we see and read on the internet. We live in an age of very sophisticated manipulation, and the bot black market for bogus Facebook and Twitter followers is just the tip of a very large iceberg. If bogus followers can be bought to influence people, why not bogus product reviews on Amazon or some other site? When we think about going out to dinner, how many of us pull out our smartphones to check Yelp or some other app to read the reviews before we decide where to go? However, in an age of bot black markets, are those reviews real or fake?
In an information-based society where that information is at our fingertips, the potential for abuse and manipulation goes on and on. The question of what information is "real/true" or "bogus/fake" becomes a blur and impossible to discern. It reminds me of my pre-internet childhood, when many people would choose a restaurant based upon how many cars were parked in front of it. That was fine until some of the more enterprising restaurant owners asked the local car dealers or their friends and employees to park out in front to create the illusion of traffic and popularity. However, the gig was up when you went inside and discovered that the restaurant was virtually empty, the service was poor and the food was awful.
Sadly, these are fairly simple and innocuous examples. The real issues are much more complicated, serious and troubling. Our government and its intelligence agencies, foreign governments and their intelligence agencies, political candidates, political parties, political action committees, etc. I am not a Twitter user, but I think we all know of a certain someone who is a big-time Twitter user, maybe the "biggest ever," and now we should all wonder how many of his followers are real and how many are fake.
David R. Witte, Plymouth
• • •
In this climate of "fake news," we should all take care not to jump to conclusions, generalize without facts and purport to speak for others. The writer of the Jan. 28 letter "Racism: If Edina is taking action, trust me, it's sorely needed" claims fear and intimidation while attending an Edina City Council meeting because of all the police cars in the parking lot. Apparently she missed the signage indicating the Edina police share the building with the city. She neglected to mention any discussion of the city meeting, preferring to cite her generalized opinion that people of color are afraid to enter Edina due to police conduct. Her gross generalization based on false assumption and hearsay without any attempt to cite facts adds nothing of value to actual, thoughtful discourse on the issue.
Jean M. Mitchell, Edina
• • •
Last week, I had the privilege of walking along Nicollet Mall, where I enjoyed all the festivities of the upcoming 2018 Super Bowl. At every intersection, an automated voice reminded pedestrians to "wait." Just as with a song or a catchy little ditty, I still can't get that word out of my head. Perhaps I should "wait" before jumping to conclusions, "wait" before judging others, "wait" before saying something I'm going to regret, "wait" before sending that poorly written e-mail and "wait" before giving up on my special projects. Mercifully, all good things come to those who "wait!"
Sharon E. Carlson, Andover
IMMIGRATION
Whatever policy we favor, it should understand families
The immigration debate asks the question: What is a family? In middle-class America, we usually think of a mom, a dad and kids under 18. Sometimes it's one parent, or any couple committed to each other long-term, with or without children.