The three-part series "Danger Downstream" (Oct. 2-4) is prophetic. Minnesotans/Americans need to be made aware of the immediate danger to not only our rivers and lakes but our drinking water. Phosphorus/nitrates are choking our water. The comments in the articles like "We are going downhill" and "it's like a big gun barrel … we are on the other end" are spot-on. I have a cabin that is being choked to death, and there are many, many other lakes and rivers in Minnesota that are impaired. Any person who lives, works or plays on the water needs to be involved. We need to ask ourselves, politicians, farmers, corporations like Cargill (with headquarters in Minnesota) and universities to be invested in making change through conservation and research.
Bill White, Eagan
ALLINA NURSES' STRIKE
In whose interest is their resistance? Theirs? Everyone's?
I am all for organized labor, collective bargaining, the right to strike, etc., but have found myself struggling to empathize with the union representing Allina nurses after reading Tuesday's front-page article ("Allina nurses reject contract with 'resounding' no, stay on strike").
If I understand correctly, the primary sticking point in the negotiations is health insurance, and the union's desire to protect its no- or low-deductible health plans instead of joining the standard corporate health plan that the rest of the company has.
From my perspective, the days of gold-plated health insurance are long gone. The majority of Minnesotans, me included, have been dealing with high-deductible health insurance plans for over a decade now.
Health insurance costs continue to spiral out of control, and as a result the vast majority of working Minnesotans have seen their premiums and deductibles rise in tandem, year over year. It's a painful reality and a byproduct of the unsustainable rise of health care costs.
The article states that the latest offer to the union included provisions to leave two of the current plans untouched through 2019, and then cap them after that at 7 percent over a three-year period. On paper, that sounds like a reasonable offer to me. I think the majority of us would jump at such an opportunity in our current health insurance environment.
And so I'm having a hard time empathizing with the union. To think a select few should continue to enjoy the gold-plated health insurance of years gone by is unrealistic at best, and at worst unfair to the rest of us who continue to shoulder the higher premiums and deductibles required to support the current system.
Brad McFaul, Rosemount
• • •