MARRIAGE AMENDMENT
Don't misuse research to bolster claims
In her Oct. 21 commentary, Autumn Leva, the spokeswoman for Minnesota for Marriage, argues that the marriage amendment is necessary because "children do best when raised by their married mother and father." As evidence, Leva refers to a 10-year-old research brief from Child Trends, a national nonprofit, nonpartisan research center that studies children at all stages of development.
What Leva fails to recognize, however, is that the research discussed by Child Trends compares married biological parents to single-parent families, step-families and cohabiting relationships. There is no comparison to stable, two-parent, same-sex households, which is the relevant and necessary comparison group for her argument to carry any weight.
The Child Trends brief in question was released in 2002, when same-sex parents were not identified in large national surveys. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn from that report about the well-being of children raised by same-sex parents.
We have pointed this out repeatedly, yet to our dismay we continue to see our research mischaracterized by some opponents of same-sex marriage. This is a disservice to the voting public.
BECCA STARR, MINNEAPOLIS, AND CAROL EMIG, WASHINGTON, D.C.
Starr is a research scientist for Child Trends, and Emig is the president.
• • •
Some argue that a "yes" vote on the marriage amendment is a vote for discrimination against homosexuals. That's bogus.