SAFE DRIVING
Why punish only the unlucky ones?
This is in response to recent proposals to increase the criminal penalties for careless driving resulting in death, and to two excellent commentaries from James Backstrom ("If drivers kill, response must be appropriate," Oct. 18) and Michael Friedman ("Tough sentences may feel good, but aren't necessarily a solution," Oct. 13).
I have been troubled throughout this discussion by the notion that driver-caused accidents resulting in death should be punished far more severely than those that do not result in death, while the actions themselves remain perfectly legal.
If driving while texting or talking on the phone is a mortal threat to others, which it clearly is, then that deliberate action should be illegal and punishable.
Few drivers purposely set out to cause an accident or death, so intent is not a factor. Distracted drivers who do cause an accident were simply unlucky.
Why should only they be treated as criminals while the rest of us are free to gamble with others' lives on a daily basis?
Let's penalize and reduce the controllable activity, not just the random result. My unscientific observation is that 90 percent of erratically driven cars have a driver on the phone -- and they are everywhere.
CATHY WALDHAUSER, GOLDEN VALLEY
* * *