Creative redefinition of terms can be a useful way to approach an issue, but Ron Way ("Democratic socialism: We're already living it," Oct. 21) broadens the definition of the word "socialism" to the point where it is indistinguishable from "government." Socialism has traditionally meant social control of the means of production. We do not have that in the U.S. We do have government-administered welfare programs as well as privately administered ones. So did many medieval societies, but they could not be called socialist. The government controls the protection of the populace through the military, the police and other agencies. Such control is a hallmark of the modern state, but it is not socialist. Victorian England — the standard model of a capitalist society — had a strong military and a police force. The government provides services such as water supplies. So did Rome, but one can hardly speak of the Roman Empire as socialist.
The debate among Americans today is about the size and scope of the national government. Mr. Way provides us with examples of government programs that have worked well and one that has gone spectacularly wrong, Veterans Affairs. Few of these are associated solely with socialist states.
Judith M. Akehurst, Eden Prairie
MINNEAPOLIS WORK RULES
Debating the philosophy and the business impact
There are two other very important things to consider when discussing Minneapolis' proposed work rules: Choice and circumstance ("Here's my side of the story on Minneapolis work rules," Oct. 20, editorial counterpoint to "Anti-business agenda should be scrapped," Oct. 16).
We all make "choices" on how we live our lives. All of those decisions are ours to make: going to school, having children, to work or not to work. A city is not responsible for the choices you make.
On the other side, there are "circumstances" that are beyond our control: the family we are born into, the neighborhood our parents choose to live in or the wages that any given job pays. With these options, if you do not like them, you may choose paths that lead you to better outcomes.
A city has the responsibility and duty to all of its citizens to decide how much of any one person's current situation is "choice" or "circumstance" and base its decision(s) accordingly.
Tina Bovis Fuller, Brooklyn Park
• • •
It appears that some of the letters to the editor supporting the Minneapolis Working Families Agenda (and condemning the Star Tribune Editorial Board) are from people who don't even live in Minneapolis. Where is their outrage for their home cities?