An Oct. 20 article reported that the MSP FairSkies Coalition and the South Metro Airport Action Council will take part in a rally protesting noise generated by planes using the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Also, that the Metropolitan Airports Commission anticipates growth in airport traffic by 2035.
Just add five years to that number, and you will get 2040. That is the Metropolitan Council's date for the region to "Thrive" — the title of its long-range plan. Since the Met Council has always wanted to extend Northstar commuter rail to St. Cloud — and beyond — just let it have its way. The St. Cloud Regional Airport recently extended runway(s), and Northstar can shuttle customers to St. Cloud for flights to wherever. Just make sure an independent cost-benefit analysis is conducted.
Wayne Dokken, Robbinsdale
WORKING FAMILIES AGENDA
Star Tribune Editorial Board takes a cruel stance on proposal
I am a longtime Star Tribune reader. While I don't always agree with the opinions of the Editorial Board, nor do I expect to, I've never before been horrified or embarrassed by one of its editorials. "Anti-business agenda should be scrapped" (Oct. 16) was insulting and mean-spirited. It's one thing to disagree with Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges and some members of the City Council on aspects of the Working Families Agenda; it's quite another thing entirely to insult their intelligence and policy experience.
As a businesswoman for 30-plus years, I support the idea of sick time for all employees. I do not think that allowing employees to earn one hour of sick time for each 30 hours worked — for a total of 40 to 72 hours a year, depending on the size of business — will break the bank. As a matter of fact, offering this type of benefit will likely increase employee loyalty, leading to decreased costs in recruiting, hiring and training hourly employees.
Frankly, this editorial read more like it had been written by the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce, not the Newspaper of the Twin Cities. Frankly, I expected more.
Mary Jo Malecha, New Brighton
• • •
We need much stronger protections for workers who have faced "wage theft" — illegal deductions from workers' paychecks. Key provisions in the proposed Working Families Agenda will provide such protections. Between 2005 and 2014, the U.S. Department of Labor found more than 5,500 violations of wage and hour laws by employers in Minneapolis. As you read this, there is an ongoing class-action lawsuit against the company that cleans Macy's stores in Minneapolis in which workers complain that they were paid as low as $4 to $5 an hour without receiving full overtime pay.
All too often, hourly workers are not paid for all of the hours they work, but they have little recourse to fight for and recover these wages, and the offending employers know it. The result? Workers and their families are not able to cover basic needs, from rent to food to health care. I am sincerely shocked to learn that the Star Tribune Editorial Board opposes such basic protections as wage theft in the Working Families Agenda.