Last week, I read a well-written commentary by a farmer explaining why politicians and, perhaps, even we can be considered responsible for polluted waterways ("Blaming farmers for pollution? Look in the mirror," Oct. 14). Yet, chemicals from farm runoff continue to flow into rivers and streams. Also last week, an article and reference to a YouTube video portrayed a confrontation between a possibly impaired African-American pedestrian and a Caucasian off-duty police officer in Edina ("Outrage spreads with video of arrest," Oct. 15). Given current events with race relations, a notion of a potential escalation of events must have been on many minds. (On Monday, it was announced that a misdemeanor charge against the pedestrian will be dismissed.)
On the front page of Monday's local section, I read the Star Tribune article about Target stores pulling clown masks because of recent issues with frightening and potentially harmful people wearing these masks. Yet, just to the right of the article was a photograph and somewhat jovial stand-alone photo presentation of someone being made up as a fairly frightful-looking zombie type of character. Meanwhile on Monday, I closely witnessed a bicyclist laden with a backpack and assumed he was going to work. Most assuredly, he was helping the carbon footprint, but he was clearly texting while riding.
We live in a society where distinctions and decisions of right and wrong face us continuously and may well be sought after in certain arenas. In some situations, there are actual laws that not only guide but govern. But there are gray areas and middle grounds, and I struggle to be cognizant of views I do not necessarily share and balance what I personally feel are moral and ethical ones and common sense.
Tolerance is much needed, but has the word "tolerance" become trite? What I consider common sense surely differs from that of various friends and neighbors. Can anyone please assist me here?
Paul Waytz, Minneapolis
EDINA POLICE INCIDENT
Interpreting the plainclothes officer's tactics with pedestrian
As a retired police officer, I feel compelled to support the Edina officer who was the subject of a video when he dealt with a person who very well may have become a traffic statistic. The man was walking on the white line that separates the main roadway from the paved shoulder, which puts him perilously close to vehicle traffic. The officer stopped to deal with what he saw as a hazard.
The video starts with the officer holding onto the man's jacket and leading him to a safer spot and also displays the start of a verbal assault on the officer and obvious reluctance on the part of the pedestrian to peacefully comply with the officer's efforts. The rest of the video shows verbal abuse by the subject and an attempt to pull away. At no time does the officer raise his voice or be more forceful in physically calming the subject than simply holding onto the jacket. The mediator who stopped to film the interaction attempts to interfere with her comments.
I ask this "mediator" how she would have felt if the officer had simply driven by the man and a few seconds later the pedestrian had become a hood ornament on an SUV. I suggest that she go out into the real world and see how mediation has its limitations in dealing with certain persons. She might also take note that the officer was in plain clothes and not wearing the "intimidating" uniform with gun belt, Taser, boots and peaked hat that apparently brings on fright in people.
Mike Auspos, Ramsey
• • •