An Oct. 14 letter writer vents that St. Paul residents like her were not notified of a proposal in the mayor's draft budget to install parking meters on a portion of Grand Avenue. Does it make sense that all ideas be shared with the community before being put into a draft budget?
In my 35 years as a St. Paul resident, I have found that most of the stores on Grand that don't have parking lots are specialty and higher-end stores and restaurants. People don't shop there for necessities; for those, they go to places like Target, CVS or Wal-Mart that are a short drive away — including (to use the writer's example) for a 40-pound bag of potting soil.
I see potential in the parking meter proposal for Grand. There are many needs in our wonderful city for money to improve its appearance and services. The meters would provide the city money without increasing property taxes, and the revenue would come from the users who are shopping and eating on Grand.
Larry Hampel, St. Paul
• • •
How we pay for transportation matters. Installing parking meters on Grand Avenue and on other commercial corridors is a way to begin having motorists pay for what they use when they use it.
In St. Paul and other municipalities, roads, bridges, traffic management and parking are paid for primarily with property taxes (and a right-of-way assessment). These taxes have little to do with driving. The one-car family that relies on the bus and occasional car trips pays the same as the family with multiple cars that drives a great deal.
If motorists have to pay to park on some of our busiest commercial corridors, more people may choose to bicycle, ride the bus or carpool with friends.
In cities across the U.S., there are successful and vibrant commercial corridors where people pay for parking. Those places and their adjoining neighborhoods benefit from reduced traffic, emissions and noise.