As the child abuse task force created by Gov. Mark Dayton convenes to examine and improve the child welfare system, we hope, first, that there will be three background presentations:
1) The crisis confronting counties in their fundamental responsibilities in responding to the basic needs of their residents. The rationale for opening a case in family assessment is the only way of ensuring a response to low-income families for social services such as stability in housing, maternal depression and adolescent runaways.
2) A clear set of statements on the privacy rights of families, when officials knock on the door alleging a maltreatment of a child.
3) A review of training social workers in the recognition of warning signals when "neglect" slips into "imminent harm."
Now let us see whether the task force has the knowledge and insight to explore the heart of the matter: how the child welfare system has become the response to the shredding of the safety net, so that the only assistance for vulnerable children born into families suffering from racial inequality and poverty is "family assessment."
Esther Wattenberg, Minneapolis
The writer is a professor in the School of Social Work and is special projects coordinator for the Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare at the University of Minnesota.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
Citizens United fuss is very much on target
"Was Citizens United fuss just hype?" asks the headline for the Oct. 11 column by David Brooks. If one just considers the outcomes of elections, perhaps, but it's the other consequences of this deluge of money spent on the longest, most expensive campaigns among all advanced nations that need addressing.
Elections that are badly underfunded are rarely, if ever, won by those with the least money. So realistically, the amount of money one has or, more important, can raise through various organizations goes too far to determine who can and cannot run for too many public offices in the first place. The consequence here is that candidates are far too indebted to their biggest money supporters, putting Lincoln's great statement about American government for, by and of the people in very serious jeopardy.