The Star Tribune's Oct. 9 editorial suggesting that Donald Trump must leave the presidential race was wrong for three important reasons:
First, the majority of Republican primary voters selected Trump, and his departure, voluntary or forced, would dismiss their voice. He is the candidate of the GOP, and all voters deserve the chance to express their opinion in the general election.
Next, the process to replace Trump is clumsy at best. The Republican National Committee selection procedure would be time-consuming; each state has distinct regulations regarding ballot inclusion, and early voting has begun in many states. Lawsuits by disgruntled voters would be inevitable.
Finally, no other potential Republican candidate has been vetted sufficiently for the presidency, and it cannot occur in a few weeks. That especially is true for Mike Pence, the alternative most frequently mentioned. Careful analysis of his experience in Congress and as governor of Indiana is critical. Voters must look carefully at his record on civil liberties, education, foreign relations, trade, criminal justice, voting rights, climate change, and health issues, including reproductive rights. As second on the GOP ticket, he has not been asked to articulate and defend his positions. We simply do not know enough.
Donald Trump is a loathsome, unqualified candidate, but replacing him less than a month from Election Day is untenable and ill-advised.
Phil George, Lakeville
• • •
Trump is the Republican choice. Knowing exactly who he was, Republican leaders from Paul Ryan to Ted Cruz to John McCain endorsed him, as well as a significant portion of the Republican electorate. And now, after more than a year of near daily proof of Trump's ignorance and misogyny and everything else you can label this fool, this newspaper thinks the Republican Party should get a pass in the final hour? Toss some new name into the ring without a year's worth of campaigning, with no daily evisceration by the news media, no digging into every possible wrongdoing, every vote, past tax returns, spouse's history, possible conflicts of interest, business dealings, policy flip-flops? Need I go on?
The Star Tribune Editorial Board has decided that Hillary Clinton, who has withstood everything thrown at her for this past year, deserves only to have an opponent with a better chance to beat her.