MARRIAGE AMENDMENT
It's not about tolerance, but doing right thing
I would hope that a philosophy student would receive an "F" if he or she turned in a paper as poorly written as retired Prof. Richard Berquist's recent commentary ("Gay marriage would actually discriminate," Nov. 1)
He argues that society shouldn't recognize gay marriage because homosexuals can't procreate. But for heterosexual relationships with no potential for procreation -- either by choice or circumstance -- he says, "the law can only go so far," and any "attempt to ascertain the capabilities and motivation of individual couples would be impractical and an intolerable invasion of privacy."
The complete lack of logic to arrive at such a conclusion can only lead me to believe Berquist writes from a completely discriminatory thought process. As if that isn't bad enough, he fails to acknowledge that homosexuals do procreate either by insemination or surrogate and are raising their children without the benefits and protections of marriage.
STEVE MILLIKAN, MINNEAPOLIS
• • •
Much has been said about Republicans not caring about the rights of minorities. Most recently, some say that they are intolerant of homosexuals. The proposed amendment to limit marriage between a man and a woman isn't about intolerance, but rather about doing things according to God's plan, as explained in the Bible.
In Mark 10:6-8, Jesus tells the Pharisees, "But at the beginning of creation, God made them male and female. For this reason, a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh." With marriage, the Bible makes the connection between a man and a woman. The proposed amendment isn't about lack of tolerance or hatred, but about striving to do the right thing.
PETE GILLQUIST, ARDEN HILLS