Readers Write: Minnesota's primary election, sexual-assault cases, Alex Jones, Peter Strzok, White Bear Lake, Minnesota Twins ownership

With all the opportunity to vote by absentee ballot or at the polls, how can we really cheer the primary turnout the "highest in decades" at a mere 21.5 percent? As a democratic nation and progressive state, we should have closer to 100 percent participation in all our votes. The major votes were split 65 percent Democrat and 35 percent Republican, but both parties reflect an apathy attitude of 78.5 percent nonparticipants.

Assuming the overall state is roughly 50-50 split by major party, the greatest turnout for the Nov. 6 election is essential to truly reflect a majority representation. An issue-focused debate, free of the usual irritating attack-ad freak show banter, could allow informed votes for the future course of Minnesota and America. Please vote.

• • •

As I voted in the primary election today, I was faced with four contested races with five or more candidates in each race. From my point of view, there were more than one very good candidate in two of these races. Most important in my mind is having a candidate acceptable to me win the primary, not necessarily which one. Ranked choice would help ensure that would happen.

My sincere thanks to the Star Tribune and Mike Sauro. The First Amendment is alive and well. You've demonstrated how opposing views can be correct.

In the case of rape victims, both sides want to see an improvement in how things are handled in what can only be described as a horrific life event. They differ in how the problem is defined, however. The Star Tribune investigative team ("Denied Justice," July 22 and 26 and Aug. 12) paints the police as the source of the problem and where things need to change. A tougher approach. Tackle every case with full resources. Enter Mike Sauro ("Rape series misrepresented investigative process," counterpoint, Aug. 14). Mike claims and points out that police resources are limited. Why direct these resources (tackle) when there's little or no chance of a successful prosecution?

Lesson learned: Collaboration moves the needle in the right direction. Both sides need to work together. The end result is progress. Lose your power/authority persona, and voilà. Life improves. For lots of folks.

What's more, his current predicament is not censorship. YouTube, Facebook and other private-media enterprises are simply heeding the voices of their outraged customers, who recognize Jones as a dangerous propagandist. In other words, it's the free market at work.

This is not to defend the Donald Trump presidency but to reinforce the electoral process.

The firing of FBI agent Peter Strzok needed to happen, as did the dismissals of James Comey, Andrew McCabe and Lisa Page. Strzok was the point person in the mishandling of the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation. He also was a key part of the ongoing Russia investigation. The political bias that was apparent in the Strzok/Page e-mails and texts displayed the agenda and the "tone at the top" of the FBI and Justice Department. The attempts to pave the way for a Clinton presidency and derail the Trump campaign with an "insurance policy" (i.e., Russia investigation) were meant to disenfranchise those voters who did not cast their ballots for Clinton. The arrogance, self-righteousness, narcissism, etc., of top-level FBI and Justice Department officers could fill a swamp.

Like it or not, Donald Trump is the president. Duly elected. The country has paid/is paying a great price for the ongoing unwillingness to respect the November 2016 election result. It's time for the politicians to act as statesmen and remember who they are working for — not themselves, not their parties, but the citizens.

• • •

A caution to the readers of the Aug. 13 front-page article "Once again, life is a beach in White Bear Lake" is called for. This article was incomplete! It likely represented quite well the beliefs and concerns of those who live on or have businesses on the lake. It fails to include the concerns of others who face the huge costs of augmentation and the loss of their gardens and lawns due to total residential watering bans. These bans exempted businesses, golf courses and other nonresidential areas with no evidence that residential watering of yards was a significant cause of low lake levels. All residents of the area are very concerned about the lake levels — don't get me wrong! But more careful logical planning is needed based on fact and the interests of all parties affected.

We are not Minnesota Twins fans and don't have $50,000 to spare, but we are Minneapolis residents and would gladly contribute to Aug. 15 letter writer Jonathan Hegre's plan to have community members buy out the Twins. Forbes estimates the value of the Twins at $1.15 billion. This means it would take around 23,000 people to donate at Hegre's $50,000 level to buy out the Twins. Minnesota's population is just over 5.5 million. If every Minnesotan chipped in, it'd take around $209 per person. If Hegre is serious about this and sets up a nonprofit, we'd gladly send our check for $418 tomorrow, and we'd even chip in for a person or two who doesn't have a couple hundred bucks to spare. We'd rather be a sunny Green Bay than a cold Omaha.