GOV. MARK DAYTON
Principled -- but some might say 'to a fault'
The Star Tribune characterized Gov. Mark Dayton's vetoes as a "hit list" ("Budget vetoed; shutdown looms," May 25). In doing so, the newspaper suggested that his decisions were vindictive and purely political in nature. This sort of language perpetuates the cynical stereotype of the selfish, power-mad politician.
In this case, however, Dayton's actions were based on principle. As with many Minnesotans, he believed that the budget bills were a threat to our most vulnerable citizens and to our quality of life.
His vetoes did not represent political theater; they represented the use of political power in the service of real, substantive political difference.
You may not agree with Dayton, but I hope we can agree that his decisions were, in fact, principled.
NOAH MASS, ROSEMOUNT
• • •
The current Legislature was elected by a majority of the people of the state of Minnesota to do the job that it has completed: to pass a balanced budget with cost-cutting measures, without raising taxes.
On the other hand, those same people elected as governor a clueless little rich boy who only knows how to spend. That combination is a recipe for stalemate.