U.S. SENATE RACE
Top schools may not make for top leaders
The May 22 Letter of the Day ("Senate candidate's opening salvo aims to misdirect"), basing the ability to govern upon graduation from a highly esteemed college, is one of the most erroneous ways to judge a candidate.
have observed top students -- if grades can equate to being at the top -- become a total waste in the practical world. (Perhaps they have a place in research or some other endeavor.)
Industry often avoids these superstudents for more-grounded average students, and government, too, is essentially embedded in the practical world.
Many times C and B students have a higher level of learning ability that allows them to spend less time grinding over books and grow into well-rounded people during those crucial formative years of their lives.
I've listened to hundreds of speakers through the years. It never ceases to amaze me how an audience can realize within five minutes if the man is a total laughingstock, and how the speaker doesn't have a clue that his audience knows it. In the case of U.S. Senate candidate Kurt Bills, it only took five minutes to realize that he is a man for the future.
CARL SEEMANN, BEMIDJI, MINN.
• • •
Tsk, tsk! We Democrats should not be snotty. It seems to me that there are many reasons to support U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken, and President Obama, without parading their degrees from "prestigious" universities. That kind of talk usually comes from the other, wealthier political party.