The Star Tribune should be ashamed of itself for comparing the videotaped assault of a Brooklyn Park police officer to the shooting death of Jamar Clark by a police officer last year in Minneapolis ("Video shows officer's fight for life").
Clark didn't assault a police officer. He was shot in the head while lying on the ground. An officer involved in the incident alleges that Clark's hand was touching his holstered gun at the time Clark was shot. This has been disputed by witnesses.
To state that Clark's interaction with the Minneapolis police officer was "similar" to an extremely violent assault during which a man shouted "[Expletive] kill you!" while repeatedly punching, elbowing and choking the Brooklyn Park police officer is irresponsible and biased journalism.
Another difference: Despite the terrifying videotaped assault, during which the officer was knocked to the ground and had his gun knocked away from him — and despite the officer, justifiably in fear for his life, shouting "Shoot him!" as his backup arrived — the suspect in the video was tasered and subdued. Jamar Clark is dead.
Rowan Viva, Minneapolis
BERNIE SANDERS
His inability to work smoothly with Democratic Party is telling
Yes, let's get the facts straight on what happened during the state convention in Nevada ("Editorial shows how media fails us," Readers Write, May 20, referring to "Sanders must quell campaign violence," May 19). PolitiFact, which is about as objective a source that we have, had people there and looked into all the claims of unfairness and determined that they were false. The 62 delegates were not seated because they did not follow the established rules, period. It was not a conspiracy. They had either failed to register as Democrats by May 1 or would not provide address and telephone.
The rules, according to PolitiFact, were not manipulated, either. Whether or not chairs were thrown, there are documented death threats against the chair of the convention. Sen. Bernie Sanders' response has been tepid. He no longer seems to be leading his movement. He is now following an out-of-control "movement." Many people want change, but just because not everyone agrees with you about how to achieve it does not make anyone "intransigent." Change takes time and work in a pluralistic democracy. If Sanders cannot even build a coalition with Democrats, then how on Earth could he govern?
Alice Johnson, Minneapolis
• • •
In response to Norman Sherman's May 20 commentary "Lessons from '68: Sanders needs to put snide aside," and his assertion that Eugene McCarthy's support would have ensured Hubert Humphrey's election in 1968: He fails to mention a few other key variables. Humphrey remained connected to President Lyndon Johnson for too long; of nearly 73 million votes cast, George Wallace won nearly 10 million (13.5 percent), and 39 percent of voters never showed up at the polls.