WAL-MART BRIBES
Columnist's argument in favor was flawed
Bribery is the mother's milk of the Mexican economy, and Wal-Mart de Mexico is no doubt part of the pay-to-play world ("A little greasing of the wheels is good for a local economy," May 1). But it's a stretch to agree with Steve Chapman that greasing some palms is the mechanism to a "better life" for Mexicans.
The consequences of bribery are seen in compromised building codes, weakened environmental and workplace rules, tax avoidance, and disrespect for police and the rule of law. The teenager-worthy "everyone does it" rationalization enables simple bribery to be the gateway to larger-scale corruption.
If it works in Acapulco, why can't it work at home?
ROBERT SCHIESEL, MINNEAPOLIS
• • •
Chapman's argument that the United States shouldn't try to enforce its ethics elsewhere raises a few questions. So, the U.S. shouldn't have interfered in Libya and shouldn't be involved in Syria, North Korea, Iran or the Balkan states, and shouldn't continuously call out China on its human-rights policies? All for the sake of U.S. corporate profits?
Ethics fall under the general category of "values." The United States has been trying to expand its values, as expressed in our Bill of Rights, since its inception, both at home and abroad.
If we don't enforce laws governing private American businesses' unethical dealings with or in other countries, then we don't have a leg to stand on when we question other countries' brutal treatment of their own people, much less enforce our own ethics laws at home.