Sometimes, laws and ideas are given names that befuddle me. For instance, one that should have been named "the law that's almost guaranteed to cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars" was instead called the "Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980." And it did cost us $125 billion.
The 2001 law that said "bend over, we're spying on everything you do" was called the "Patriot Act."
Laws that say "we hate unions" are called "Right to Work."
The 1996 law that said "we hate gays" was instead called the "Defense of Marriage Act."
And now, the proposed law to allow monopolistic Internet service providers to continue to be monopolistic is called the "Internet Freedom Act."
Those and others continue in the tradition of the novel "1984," where "war is peace" and "2+2=5."
Bill Slobotski, Roseville
MINNEAPOLIS SCHOOLS
The district can't win under policies that allow 'flight'
My daughter attends Anwatin Middle School in Minneapolis. It's a great school with wonderful after-school activities (she is on the ski team and in the school play). Yet, when I mention our child is at Anwatin, people look at me as if I'm a leper. They ask, "So, really, how is it?" I'm not from around here, so am thankfully unaware of the rumors, bad (and unwarranted) press, and prior history of this school. The reality is that currently it's a fine school.
This disconnect is one of the many reasons why the public policy of allowing students to leave Minneapolis Public Schools for the suburbs for any reason is misguided ("Mpls. fights school flight," March 19). The policy is counterproductive. The parents who want to leave the district are the very parents that we need to remain in the district in order to effect change. The policy of allowing families to leave the district can lead to a vicious circle, and it is the children of Minneapolis who are affected.