So often the argument from those who oppose name changes (of lakes or buildings) is something along the line of "we shouldn't 'whitewash' or attempt to 'rewrite' history" ("Name change dishonors past," Readers Write, May 2). And then we get caught up debating the past.
I suggest we look at these name changes differently. We've all known of companies that have changed their names or their company logos. They call it "rebranding." I even know of churches that have changed their names. Many women change their names when they marry. By doing so, they aren't denigrating their past or denying the complexity of their history, whatever it may be. They may even be quite proud of their past. But the direction they are focused on is their future. They ask: "What name fits me/us now, and will best serve me/us from this point onward?"
Whether speaking about buildings at the University of Minnesota or a lake in south Minneapolis, what are the best names for these now, given our current culture, values and ideals? What names best reflect the future we hope to build? People change, and names change, too.
Lisa Wersal, Vadnais Heights
• • •
The Star Tribune's April 30 editorial ("Unity in history: Decisions on names for Fort Snelling and Lake Calhoun fail to recognize the state's native peoples," May 1) was both disappointing and disconcerting. The Editorial Board claims the decision is an affront to those who worked for years to build support for the name change. What's really an affront is the blatant disregard — shown by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, the Hennepin County Board, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, and now the editorial page — for the Minnesota statute that requires legislative approval for a name change on a body of water when the name has existed for 40 years. If you don't like the statute, recommend a new one or a new process, but don't flout a law simply because it's not selectively convenient. The Editorial Board laments that the state must now deal with this fresh controversy, but Minnesotans are the ones to lament as they suffer from the hubris of the Park Board that disregarded its own attorney, who warned back in 2015 that the name change needed to go through the Legislature. And lest Park Board President Brad Bourn (who claims that "we" pay for the signage around the lakes) forgets: The Park Board pays for nothing; we the people do.
Susan Hitchner, Minneapolis
• • •
In "Court says it's Lake Calhoun" (front page, April 30), "Save Lake Calhoun" attorney Erick Kaardal was quoted as saying, "We don't have to pronounce Bde Maka Ska."
If they don't want to learn Bde Maka Ska, perhaps they can pronounce "misplaced indignation."
Evelyn Reilly, Minneapolis
• • •
Repeat after me:
1) Bidet (a bathroom fixture)