As I write this on Tuesday, I have just completed my role as a juror in a Hennepin County criminal trial. Never having been a juror before, I was impressed with what I experienced.
My fellow jurors were attentive, thoughtful and open-minded. During deliberations, we shared openly and listened carefully to one another. We were intent on making sure that we reinspected and intelligently and carefully reviewed and discussed the evidence, and that we understood the judge's instructions to us about our duty in making our finding.
The deliberation process was insightful and reassuring that the jury system functions as it should.
There will be those who criticize the jury's decision in the Kimberly Potter trial. But, unless you have not only watched the trial, but also re-reviewed and studied all of the evidence, you don't have the clarity, understanding and insight about the case that the group of 12 jurors has. Let's have faith in the jury system.
Beth Duffy, Bloomington
•••
I would suggest changing the summary of D.J. Tice's column "The verdict of a 13th juror" (Opinion Exchange, Dec. 21) from "When does a mistake become a crime?" to "When does carelessness excuse a killing?" Changing the frame makes a difference.
Jonathan Kahn, Minneapolis