MIDDLE CLASS
The term doesn't have universal meaning
Politicians casually throw out the term "middle class" as if we all understand what being in the "middle class" means. The "middle class" consists of black people, white people and all the skin shades in between.
It consists of doctors, tradesmen, employers, employees, the self-employed, renters, homeowners, professionals, craftsmen, retired people, young people, men, women, Republicans, Democrats, extremists and millions of people each with their own particular circumstances.
The middle class isn't some monolithic voting bloc with universally common interests. So when a politician proposes a bill to benefit the middle class, how can he or she possibly be acting in the interests of all those disparate categories? It's not possible.
When society finally comes to understand that the "middle class" as such does not exist, we will have come a long way toward understanding that government should be looking at its citizens as individuals, not voting blocs.
BOB HAGEMAN, CHASKA
* * *
WISCONSIN ELECTION
Did big GOP determine the outcome?
A recent letter to the editor cited the need for voter ID to have an "honest and fair" election. I still don't believe that. But if the recall election in Wisconsin shows anything, in order to have honest and fair elections, corporate and PAC money must be kept away from the campaigns. Gov. Scott Walker outspent his opponent seven to one, and most of Walker's campaign money came from outside Wisconsin, including funds from a Virginia-based group called Coalition For American Values. The addresses given for the group trace back to UPS stores, and its website doesn't list who is behind the group. Now is this fair or honest? I say that only local money should be used in local elections, and that there should be full disclosure of donors.
ANDREW DVORAK, MINNETONKA