A June 22 letter writer ("Trump as candidate") first mentions two wealthy philanthropists of the past donating millions for worthy causes. He then compares them to Donald Trump and the Koch brothers, who he says " … want to use their wealth only to gain the presidency …"
He couldn't be more wrong about the Koch brothers. Each year Koch Industries and its affiliated companies and charitable foundations donate many millions of dollars to worthy causes. In addition to the company's corporate giving, each brother has his own foundation, giving millions more. Close to home, their subsidiary, Flint Hills Resources, commits hundreds of thousands of dollars to Minnesota programs and organizations.
Yes, the Koch brothers donate to Republicans and conservative causes, but that amount pales in comparison to what they give to universities, hospitals, boys and girls clubs, Goodwill Industries, the Special Olympics, United Way, and (surprise, surprise) the Nature Conservancy — hardly a right-wing organization!
Gary Nash, Chanhassen
LIVING-WAGE JOBS
Taxpayers feel the burden as American dream grows elusive
"Workforce housing has to be as important as low-income housing, or our job creators will be stifled," Austin (Minn.) city administrator Craig Clark wrote in a June 24 letter.
One hundred years ago, companies provided housing and groceries at the company store. After two world wars and thanks to a strong labor movement, workers began to finally achieve the American dream, with homeownership and all the good things a few extra dollars well managed could buy.
Now after 40 years of declining real wages, subsidized housing, food stamps and subsidized school lunches help replace the company store all on the backs of the taxpayers. What a good deal for the investors in the corporations that have the duty to provide profit. Living-wage jobs are what America needs, not jobs where taxpayers subsidize low-paying corporations and workers living in substandard housing.
Jim Goudy, Austin, Minn.
PROTON POWER
Be skeptical of any research backed by the Mayo Clinic
Thank you for your balanced article on the debut of proton beam radiotherapy at the Mayo Clinic ("Mayo harnesses proton power," June 23). I have only one issue regarding the reporter's statement, "Research supports its use for certain adult brain tumors and tumors in children …" In fact, no such evidence exists to date. I applaud the intent to do research to prove the technology's effectiveness, but with Mayo having such a huge stake in the game, the research must be subjected to intense peer review to assure that the conclusions reached are objective and valid before exposing vulnerable populations to an as-yet unproven technology.
Christopher L. Moertel, Minneapolis
CATHOLIC WOMEN
Why don't we hear their solutions for what ails church?
Your reporters are missing half the population when they quote and only seek out statements from male Catholic officials and professors.