One wonders if James Lileks bothered to pick up the phone and call anybody at Edina City Hall when he wrote "Driven design" (Streetscapes column, June 25). It appears that the article is informed by imagery and information from the 1950s, along with the author's drive-by of the Southdale area. The result: an article that ignores steps that city staff and volunteers have taken to encourage urban design that promotes walking and biking — transport modes that curb greenhouse gases. This is a big deal, as Edina has been leading in the area of sustainable municipal design. It joined the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program in 2012 and has a complete-streets policy. Perhaps Lileks would like to experience the Edina Promenade — an 80-foot-wide greenway with pedestrian and bike trails that runs from Centennial Lakes to the Galleria.
While people can easily drive their cars to large stores and stock up on huge supplies of toilet paper in Edina, this is something that people can do throughout the Twin Cities — Edina is not unique in this regard. Look at the Target on Snelling Avenue or the Lunds & Byerlys in Richfield. The big story is that Edina municipal planning is actively promoting nonvehicular activity, walking and biking — and that is peachy-keen. Maybe Lileks should get out of his car the next time he visits our fair city.
Julie Risser, Edina
TEXAS ABORTION CASE
A thought experiment for those who like Supreme Court ruling
While analogies are seldom perfect, I submit that the following proposed statute would have some similarities in its "stated purpose" and its "true intent" to the 2013 Texas law struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday. See if you can get beyond the "noble purpose" and find the true intent that five Supreme Court justices were able to see in the Texas law:
"In order to protect the lives and safety of all Minnesota voters, be it hereby resolved that all voting sites must be located in a city that has a crime rate that is below the state average."
Best wishes to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and to Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.
James Halvorson, Farmington
• • •
In response to the U.S. Supreme Court decision on a Texas law that required all abortion doctors to have local admitting privileges at nearby hospitals and to upgrade abortion clinics to that of hospital standards, President Obama said, "We remain strongly committed to the protection of women's health, including protecting a woman's access to safe, affordable health care and her right to determine her own future."
Safe? Really? The Texas law required that abortion clinics be held to hospital-like standards and that doctors be able to admit their patients to nearby hospitals. Would not the increased standards for the clinics and ensuring the abortion doctors are able to admit their mistakes to a nearby hospital be in the best interest of women's health?