What is it with these doctors? They can't prescribe medical marijuana because it might, what … turn them into addicts or heaven forbid, kill them ("Patients scramble for pot doctors," June 11)? It bothers me that they've justified their actions on that basis when, really, all they're thinking about is their own professional safety.
I watched my mother die of ALS over the course of a year, and I would have moved heaven and earth (or to Colorado) if there was the slightest chance something might ease her suffering. No human should have to suffer like that when there is something that might ease their pain. Shame on all of you doctors for hiding behind the veil of unknown risk when the known risk is a horrifying, painful death.
Laurel DeLaittre, Shorewood
• • •
Regarding Ed Gogek's June 8 commentary "Why docs don't favor medical pot": While there have been studies showing that marijuana can shrink cancerous tumors, medical marijuana is essentially a palliative drug. If a doctor recommends marijuana to a cancer patient undergoing chemotherapy and it helps the patient feel better, it's working. Medical marijuana is a quality-of-life decision best left to patients and their doctors. Drug warriors waging war on noncorporate drugs contend that organic marijuana is not an effective health intervention. Their prescribed intervention for medical-marijuana patients is handcuffs, jail cells and criminal records. This heavy-handed approach suggests that drug warriors should not be dictating health care decisions.
Robert Sharpe, Arlington, Va.
The writer is a policy analyst for Common Sense for Drug Policy.
STATE GOVERNMENT
Many have looked bad getting us to wherever it is we are
Wrangling to deal with the 2015 Legislature's disgusting mess involved gutting responsibility of the state auditor and abolishing the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Citizens' Board. Both were sleazy, backroom deals orchestrated by Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, DFL-Cook, in retaliation for anyone even thinking about how to mitigate harmful effects of nonferrous mining in northeastern Minnesota. To restore transparency and trust in our democratic legislative process, the first item in a special session should to be to strip Bakk and his scheming cronies of their legislative leadership positions.
Ron Way, Edina
• • •
The June 9 headline read "Dayton backs down on audit dispute," but I think people might have been given the wrong impression. House Speaker Kurt Daudt had already told the governor that his caucus was willing to see 9,400 state employees go off the job rather than negotiate on this one item, as they have done in the past. The governor's action was the responsible position, and I congratulate him for being the bigger man.