Although I am a supporter of light rail as an integral component of a cost-effective transportation system, I disagree with the concluding sentence in the July 19 editorial that the Minnesota Legislature needs "a plan to pay for Southwest light rail," implying that, given DFL control of the Senate, a special session will not occur successfully without it. With all of the major unresolved matters that appear to have agreement now, I am puzzled why the unresolved light-rail issue would derail the special session, because:
1) It is not definite that the 50 percent federal match will go away if the Southwest light-rail conflict is not solved this year.
2) Environmental issues have been contested, and neighborhood lawsuits against the Southwest line have not been resolved.
3) A temporary solution already exists with a cost-effective nonstop bus service from Eden Prairie that arrives in Minneapolis faster than the projected light-rail service would.
Senate leaders ought to table the Southwest light-rail issue until the next official legislative session in January, so that the numerous crucial issues that affect the entire state can be resolved now in a special session.
Sheldon Olkon, Golden Valley
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION
A party of no ideas, just loads of animosity. (Still, that platform.)
"We're going to take down Hillary": This is what the Republican Party is going to focus on during this election? This is truly a sad state of affairs for this country. Politics for the Republicans now is no longer about improving work and quality of living for all within the U.S. and about the role we play on the global stage; it has morphed into personal vendettas simply because the Republicans have no other answers to offer.
Surely, by now even the most hard-core Republican has to comprehend that the party's designated presidential candidate, and by default the party itself, has the potential to be the most dangerous thing the U.S. has offered the world in quite some time.
Sarah Fuller-Gipp, Minneapolis
• • •